Prediction of Liam Branger [] vs Matthew Hulme [817th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W W L W L L W L LHead-2-Head: Branger 1 - 0 Hulme
They have played 2 sets in total, with Branger winning 2 and Hulme winning 0. The last match between Branger and Hulme was at the Noumea Challenger, 30-12-2024, Q3, Hard with Liam Branger getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liam Branger | 1 |
| Matthew Hulme | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Liam Branger
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:48 | Average Match Time | 1:14:48 |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) |
| 88% (28/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (25/40) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 71% (10/14) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (19/54) | Return Points Win % | 21% (11/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liam Branger vs Matthew Hulme Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Branger 1 - 0 Hulme
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Branger has won 47.9% of points on their second serve, while Hulme has won 48.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Branger, in recent form, has won 36.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hulme has won 40.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 17.68% and 26.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Branger has saved 44.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hulme has saved 57.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Branger has won 65.22% of matches played (W/L 15/ 8), with Hulme winning 39.39% (W/L 13/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Branger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Hulme has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 55/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Branger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 13/ 7), where as Hulme has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Branger winning 1 times and Hulme being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Branger winning 2 and Hulme winning 0. The last match between Branger and Hulme was at the Noumea Challenger, 30-12-2024, Q3, Hard with Liam Branger getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Branger and Hulme have played a deciding set 0 times, with Branger winning 0 times and Hulme 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Branger winning 0, and Hulme 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Branger has played against opponents with an average rank of 17.57 while Hulme has played against players with an average rank of 59.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Branger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hulme has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Branger has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hulme has converted 27.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Liam Branger vs Matthew Hulme Best Odds For The Match
Liam Branger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Liam Branger
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Adam Taylor
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Liam Branger
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Felix Einig
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Liam Branger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
117)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 7-6(14) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Daniil Glinka
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Benjamin Vitter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
James Watt
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
5
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
12 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
5
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Hulme
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Sam Young-Mathers
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Matthew Hulme
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Yi Zhou
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cruz Hewitt
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Branger vs Hulme?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Branger Vs Hulme is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (24/20) | Win/Loss | 50% (64/64) |
| 57% (56/42) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (151/149) |
| 53% (509/445) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1563/1508) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 161 | Aces Total | 502 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 125 | Total Double Faults | 197 |
| 1:16:34 | Average Match Time | 1:13:44 |
| 34.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 102.55 |
| 63% (1357/2165) | 1st Serve % | 68% (4460/6546) |
| 69% (935/1357) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3112/4460) |
| 49% (399/808) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1063/2086) |
| 48% (101/211) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (183/467) |
| 41% (881/2128) | Return Points Win % | 35% (2241/6405) |
| 55% (24/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (62/126) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 20% (2/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 82% (28/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (63/50) |
| 18% (28/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (63/13) |
| 6% (16/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (65/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
